O.J. AND TRUMP: CELEBRITY VICTIMS

O.J. AND TRUMP: CELEBRITY VICTIMS, Watching FX’s “The People v. O.J. Simpson: American Crime Story” brings me aback to the one day I spent in 1995 at Simpson’s annihilation trial. I play that day over and over in my head. The case had spent an disproportionate bulk of time allurement the coroner about an angle in Nicole Simpson’s aback caused, if I anamnesis correctly, from the angle in her bra strap. I anticipation prosecutors were amiss to bake hours on development instead of presenting a simple but adverse three-week case. No, reporters who had followed the balloon from the alpha assured me, prosecutors had to authorize the indentation’s could cause rather than duke an aperture to Simpson’s acknowledged “Dream Team.”

I should accept accomplished that the trial’s columnist band had gotten sucked in to the accessible relations spin; in acknowledgment them, I was, too. The Dream Team had done such a accomplished job admiring the media that prosecutors started arena to the cameras, not the jury. Distorted by media saturation, I accept the “Trial of the Century” concluded with O.J. Simpson’s accepting abroad with killing his ex-wife and aide Ronald Goldman.

How applicable that the miniseries, based on Jeffrey Toobin’s book The Run of His Life: The People v. O.J. Simpson, is airing as 2016 GOP presidential primary beloved Donald Trump is searching for new means to play the victim and boss the account cycle.

The Dream Team assertive jurors that Los Angeles badge had it out for Simpson because he was black, if to the contrary, Toobin notes, cops had been too simple on Simpson if he exhausted his wife because Simpson was a celebrity. In like fashion, the billionaire Trump has supporters cerebration that he is an alien when, to the contrary, he is an cabal and that he is an underdog if he is a affluent bully.

The Trump Show’s latest artifice aberration started if left-leaning activists fell beneath the mistaken consequence that they accept the appropriate to abolish Trump’s chargeless accent rights. Wrong. They accept a appropriate to beef alfresco a Trump rally, but if they try to arrest the applicant central a attack event, Team Trump has the appropriate to adios them. Things went south endure anniversary if a 78-year-old activist punched a protester as he was escorted outside. It is fair to accredit some of the accusation to Trump, as The Donald at a contempo assemblage harked aback to the acceptable old canicule if annoying protesters would be agitated out in stretchers. He aswell said he would pay the acknowledged bills of supporters who bite protesters.

Trump’s accurate believers see a arrangement ample adjoin them, even though, according to media babysitter Andrew Tindall, Trump garnered 32 percent of the three above networks’ nightly account advantage of the presidential attack in 2015 — added than 2.5 times the time for the second-most covered candidate, Hillary Clinton. Sen. Marco Rubio should be so aggrieved.

Saturation media advantage distorts reality. Toobin writes that 95 actor Americans watched some of the Bronco hunt that followed Simpson’s abortion to about-face himself in to authorities; it exceeded the amount who watched the Super Bowl that year by 5 million. Usually if a doubtable tries to run from police, the act itself is advised a assurance of guilt. Yet during the Bronco chase, Angelenos cheered. Likewise, if Trump bashes the media, admirers applaud. They abhorrence the media, but they adulation Trump because he is on TV.
Share on Google Plus

About JULIA

This is a short description in the author block about the author. You edit it by entering text in the "Biographical Info" field in the user admin panel.
    Blogger Comment
    Facebook Comment