Renita Hill filed the clothing in October, claiming that the actor had defamed her in accessible statements. Hill, who is one of the added than 50 women who accept accused Cosby of animal assault, cited three incidences in which Cosby lashed out adjoin his accusers' statements and appropriate they bare to be "fact-checked."
Court affidavit appearance that Adjudicator Arthur J. Schwab absolved the three claims because they "do not abutment a affirmation for aspersion as authentic by Pennsylvania law."
His cardinal added that Cosby's comments were a "far cry from labeling [Hill] (and the added women who accept fabricated agnate accessible assertions) as liars or extortionists."
"None of the facts declared by [Hill] accurate her claims for defamation, apocryphal light, or advised accident of affecting ache beneath Pennsylvania law," Cosby's lawyer, Monique Pressley, said in a account acquaint on Twitter. "It is our achievement that courts in added jurisdictions with agnate affairs will acknowledge in like manner."
"We are disappointed, but abide committed to gluttonous amends in this matter," George Kontos, Hill's lawyer, told CNN. "We acerb disagree with the judge's acumen that Cosby's statements are constitutionally adequate opinions."
Hill affairs to address the decision.
Blogger Comment
Facebook Comment