CBS' Dickerson Lets Christie Pretend Voter Fraud Is Rampant In New Jersey, CBS' John Dickerson consistently filled in for previous Face the Nation host Bob Schieffer before he resigned, so I had no incredible trusts in him improving occupation than his forerunner once their system reported Schieffer's substitution. He figured out how to meet those low desires right out of the crate in his first week at work amid his meeting with New Jersey Governor and potential 2016 GOP comedian auto inhabitant, Chris Christie.
After Hillary Clinton called for general quit voter enrollment and 20 day early voting in every state, shockingly, Christie, Republicans all over and their empowering influences in the media quickly went on the assault.
Christie lashed out at Clinton for the push for ahead of schedule voting, guaranteeing that she "simply needs a chance to submit more noteworthy demonstrations of voter misrepresentation around the nation." Anyone who really takes after the certainties, as opposed to Republican fearmongering on the issue knows very well indeed that voter extortion is essentially non-existent, however that hasn't halted them from doing only that each time somebody sticks an amplifier anyplace almost one of their mouths.
They escape with rehashing that lie on the grounds that TV hosts like John Dickerson permit it, as the viewers were dealt with to this Sunday:
DICKERSON: Hillary Clinton said you and said you and different Republicans are attempting to make it harder for individuals to vote. What is your response to that?
CHRISTIE: She doesn't hear what she's saying.
In New Jersey, we have early voting that are accessible to individuals. I would prefer not to grow it and build the open doors for extortion. Perhaps that is what Mrs. Clinton needs to do. I don't have the foggiest idea.
In any case, the truth of the matter is that people in New Jersey have a lot of a chance to vote. What's more, perhaps in the event that she took a few inquiries a few spots and realized a few things, possibly she wouldn't put forth such crazy expressions.
DICKERSON: She says its apprehension mongering, this thought that there's a considerable measure of decision misrepresentation going on.
CHRISTIE: Yes. All things considered, she's never been to New Jersey, I presume.
Which obviously got zero subsequent meet-up Dickerson. Our companion Steve M. dismantled Dickerson for that pleasantly here (accentuation mine): Voter Fraud: The Socially Acceptable Conspiracy Theory:
There were such a large number of chances for Dickerson to ask an in number follow-up here, or a few subsequent meet-ups. He could have asked: Governor, would you say you are stating that early voting leads straightforwardly to voter extortion? In which case, why aren't you attempting to dispose of it in your state? Alternately would you say you are stating that you have quite recently the right number of days of ahead of schedule voting in your state keeping in mind the end goal to counteract voter misrepresentation, however in the event that you had any all the more, all of a sudden there'd be voter extortion? In which case, what's the enchantment recipe? When does early voting inexorably prompt voter misrepresentation? Is it true that you are mindful of any instances of voter misrepresentation that have emerged in your state as an aftereffect of ahead of schedule voting? Is it true that you are mindful of any voter misrepresentation in your state by any stretch of the imagination?
Dickerson doesn't solicit any from that. He does ask, alluding to Hillary Clinton, "She says its fearmongering, this thought that there's a considerable measure of decision extortion going on." Christie answers, "Definitely, well, she's never been to New Jersey, I presume."
Importance what? On the off chance that she knew my state, she'd know what a fake ridden hellhole it is? Is it accurate to say that he is really boasting about the level of voter misrepresentation in New Jersey?
Shouldn't Dickerson have requested that he expand on this? Shouldn't he have attempted to make the authentic point that voter extortion basically doesn't exist in this nation, instead of treating the nonexistence of voter misrepresentation as Hillary Clinton's assessment?
No, that is not how it meets expectations. The Republican Party is all in on the thought of across the board voter extortion, so the standard media permits it to be talked about as though doubters are simply communicating a supposition as opposed to reporting a reality. In the perspective of the standard squeeze, its splendidly OK for Christie to state that the legendary voter-misrepresentation issue is genuine and to make the totally unconfirmed attestation that a lot of right on time voting prompts voter extortion. You can't challenge these affirmations as totally in opposition to the actualities - it would be viewed as one-sided and impolite.
Dickerson appears to have gone to the same "school" of "news-casting" as Chuck Todd, where you learn not to ask extreme inquiries in light of the fact that your visitors may not have any desire to return.
After Hillary Clinton called for general quit voter enrollment and 20 day early voting in every state, shockingly, Christie, Republicans all over and their empowering influences in the media quickly went on the assault.
Christie lashed out at Clinton for the push for ahead of schedule voting, guaranteeing that she "simply needs a chance to submit more noteworthy demonstrations of voter misrepresentation around the nation." Anyone who really takes after the certainties, as opposed to Republican fearmongering on the issue knows very well indeed that voter extortion is essentially non-existent, however that hasn't halted them from doing only that each time somebody sticks an amplifier anyplace almost one of their mouths.
They escape with rehashing that lie on the grounds that TV hosts like John Dickerson permit it, as the viewers were dealt with to this Sunday:
DICKERSON: Hillary Clinton said you and said you and different Republicans are attempting to make it harder for individuals to vote. What is your response to that?
CHRISTIE: She doesn't hear what she's saying.
In New Jersey, we have early voting that are accessible to individuals. I would prefer not to grow it and build the open doors for extortion. Perhaps that is what Mrs. Clinton needs to do. I don't have the foggiest idea.
In any case, the truth of the matter is that people in New Jersey have a lot of a chance to vote. What's more, perhaps in the event that she took a few inquiries a few spots and realized a few things, possibly she wouldn't put forth such crazy expressions.
DICKERSON: She says its apprehension mongering, this thought that there's a considerable measure of decision misrepresentation going on.
CHRISTIE: Yes. All things considered, she's never been to New Jersey, I presume.
Which obviously got zero subsequent meet-up Dickerson. Our companion Steve M. dismantled Dickerson for that pleasantly here (accentuation mine): Voter Fraud: The Socially Acceptable Conspiracy Theory:
There were such a large number of chances for Dickerson to ask an in number follow-up here, or a few subsequent meet-ups. He could have asked: Governor, would you say you are stating that early voting leads straightforwardly to voter extortion? In which case, why aren't you attempting to dispose of it in your state? Alternately would you say you are stating that you have quite recently the right number of days of ahead of schedule voting in your state keeping in mind the end goal to counteract voter misrepresentation, however in the event that you had any all the more, all of a sudden there'd be voter extortion? In which case, what's the enchantment recipe? When does early voting inexorably prompt voter misrepresentation? Is it true that you are mindful of any instances of voter misrepresentation that have emerged in your state as an aftereffect of ahead of schedule voting? Is it true that you are mindful of any voter misrepresentation in your state by any stretch of the imagination?
Dickerson doesn't solicit any from that. He does ask, alluding to Hillary Clinton, "She says its fearmongering, this thought that there's a considerable measure of decision extortion going on." Christie answers, "Definitely, well, she's never been to New Jersey, I presume."
Importance what? On the off chance that she knew my state, she'd know what a fake ridden hellhole it is? Is it accurate to say that he is really boasting about the level of voter misrepresentation in New Jersey?
Shouldn't Dickerson have requested that he expand on this? Shouldn't he have attempted to make the authentic point that voter extortion basically doesn't exist in this nation, instead of treating the nonexistence of voter misrepresentation as Hillary Clinton's assessment?
No, that is not how it meets expectations. The Republican Party is all in on the thought of across the board voter extortion, so the standard media permits it to be talked about as though doubters are simply communicating a supposition as opposed to reporting a reality. In the perspective of the standard squeeze, its splendidly OK for Christie to state that the legendary voter-misrepresentation issue is genuine and to make the totally unconfirmed attestation that a lot of right on time voting prompts voter extortion. You can't challenge these affirmations as totally in opposition to the actualities - it would be viewed as one-sided and impolite.
Dickerson appears to have gone to the same "school" of "news-casting" as Chuck Todd, where you learn not to ask extreme inquiries in light of the fact that your visitors may not have any desire to return.
Blogger Comment
Facebook Comment