White House rejects Seymour Hersh 'baseless assertions' on terrorist raid, The White home is dismissing as "baseless" a debatable report alleging President Barack Obama's administration song concerning the circumstances close the 2011 killing of Osama terrorist.
"There ar too several inaccuracies and groundless assertions during this piece to reality check all," White House National Security voice Ned worth same in a very statement to reporters.
He took aim specifically at journalist Seymour Hersh's assertion that the administration collaborated with Pakistani officers to kill the al al-Qaeda leader, expression that "the notion that the operation that killed Usama Bin Rhaeto-Romanic was something however a unilateral U.S. mission is plain false."
"As we tend to same at the time, information of this operation was confined to a really tiny circle of senior U.S. officials. The President set too soon to not inform the other government, as well as the Pakistani Government, that wasn't notified till once the raid had occurred," worth same.
"We had been and still be partners with Asian country in our joint effort to destroy Base, however this was a U.S. operation through and thru."It was the White House's 1st response to Hersh's beautiful report, printed this weekend within the London Review of Books, outlining what he describes because the true circumstances close bin Laden's death. different former administration officers have panned the report additionally, and through the daily press informing, White House voice bait Earnest once more laid-off the report, citing CNN National Security Analyst Peter Bergen's comment that "what's true during this story is not new, and what is new within the story is not true."
"I thought that was a reasonably great way of describing why nobody here is especially involved concerning it," he said.
Citing associate degree anonymous "major U.S. source," Hersh writes that the Obama administration cooperated with Pakistani intelligence officers to kill terrorist, which the chief of workers of the Pakistani army and director general of the Inter-Services Intelligence Agency knew concerning the mission, contrary to Obama's claim that Pakistani officers weren't tuned in to the raid beforehand.
A U.S. official with careful information of the reaching to the Pakistanis once the raid tells CNN that supported the reaction it absolutely was clear the Pakistanis failed to recognize beforehand
CNN National Security Analyst Peter city right away rebutted Hersh's allegations in a very post that contradicts most of the claims in his ten,000 word report."Hersh's account of the terrorist raid could be a miscellanea of nonsense that's contravened by a mess of spectator accounts, inconvenient facts and easy logic," city wrote Mon.Hersh's supply is known as a "retired senior intelligence official UN agency was {knowledgeable concerning|intimate|intimate with|knowledgeable|experienced} the initial intelligence about bin Laden's presence in Abbottabad."
And on CNN's "New Day" on Mon morning, Hersh defended that sourcing and questioned why the Obama administration hadn't nonetheless gone through the report.
"This isn't a wager — this is often a story that must be restricted by this government terribly seriously," he told CNN's Chris Cuomo.
Hersh stuck by his claims on CNN. In explaining why he relied mostly on the "major U.S. source," Hersh same that it's "very robust for guys still within to urge quoted extensively," and declared that he "vetted most and verified" his sourcing with more reportage in Asian country.
But Hersh, UN agency has drawn criticism for his serious use of anonymous sourcing before, admitted that he had gotten some things wrong in his reportage before.
"I would argue that plenty of the stories I wrote were just about on-mark," he said, however he acknowledged: "Nobody's good, after all -- everybody's done dangerous stories."
Indeed, he same he might have gotten the state wherever the military practiced the operation wrong within the piece as a result of "sometimes my geographics gets lousy."
Hersh additionally unconcealed that the piece hinged partly on associate degree on-the-record interview with former international intelligence agency head info. Assad Durrani UN agency told him, "look, you bought the story." That was "one of the items that created the story achievable currently wherever it would not have been" before, he said.
Bergen, in his report pushing back on Hersh's claims, says he reached resolute Durrani and received a way completely different response.
Durrani same he had "no proof of associate degreey kind" that the international intelligence agency knew that terrorist was activity in Abbottabad however he still might "make an assessment that this might be plausible."
Hersh additionally pushed back against skepticism over the claims in his article, line of work it a "Lewis author fairy tale" to believe terrorist would've been activity in such associate degree simply accessible region of Asian country.
The administration has same they received info on bin Laden's whereabouts by following his traveler, which the highest military target was killed {in a|during a|in associate degree exceedingly|in a very} firefight with an elite team of Navy SEALs.
But Hersh writes that the Obama administration had at first united to mention {bin laden|bin Laden|Osama terrorist|Usama bin Laden|terrorist} had been killed by a drone strike; that international intelligence agency was holding bin Laden a unfortunate person at the Abbottabad compound wherever he was killed, which a former senior Pakistani intelligence agent told the U.S. of his whereabouts for the $25 million award being offered at the time.
Hersh additionally reports on jactitation from some SEALs that terrorist wasn't given a burial bewildered that adhered to Islamic non secular traditions because the administration had claimed -- rather, his remains "were thrown into a personnel pouch and, throughout the eggbeater flight back to Jalalabad, some body elements were tossed out over the mountain range mountains."Hersh additionally alleges Obama's speech saying the productive mission was "put along in a very rush," not vetted or cleared by national security officers and created "chaos within the weeks following."
"This series of selfish and inaccurate statements would produce chaos within the weeks following," he said.
Hersh quotes his supply as saying: "This wasn't the fog of war.
"The proven fact that there was associate degree agreement with the Pakistanis and no contingency analysis of what was to be disclosed if one thing went wrong -- that wasn't even mentioned," the supply says. "And once it went wrong, that they had to form up a replacement cowl story on the fly."
Hersh won the newspaper publisher in 1970 for his surprising report on the My Lai massacre throughout the war that was wide attributable with contributory to the general public backlash against the war, and has since reported on conflicts in Republic of Iraq, Asian country and Syria.
But Hersh has come back beneath frequent criticism for his serious use of nameless sources. In 2004, for example, his report that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld effectively approved abuses against terrorists control at Abu Ghraib jail was laid-off by a Pentagon advocator as "the most hysterical piece of journalist malpractice I actually have ever discovered."
"There ar too several inaccuracies and groundless assertions during this piece to reality check all," White House National Security voice Ned worth same in a very statement to reporters.
He took aim specifically at journalist Seymour Hersh's assertion that the administration collaborated with Pakistani officers to kill the al al-Qaeda leader, expression that "the notion that the operation that killed Usama Bin Rhaeto-Romanic was something however a unilateral U.S. mission is plain false."
"As we tend to same at the time, information of this operation was confined to a really tiny circle of senior U.S. officials. The President set too soon to not inform the other government, as well as the Pakistani Government, that wasn't notified till once the raid had occurred," worth same.
"We had been and still be partners with Asian country in our joint effort to destroy Base, however this was a U.S. operation through and thru."It was the White House's 1st response to Hersh's beautiful report, printed this weekend within the London Review of Books, outlining what he describes because the true circumstances close bin Laden's death. different former administration officers have panned the report additionally, and through the daily press informing, White House voice bait Earnest once more laid-off the report, citing CNN National Security Analyst Peter Bergen's comment that "what's true during this story is not new, and what is new within the story is not true."
"I thought that was a reasonably great way of describing why nobody here is especially involved concerning it," he said.
Citing associate degree anonymous "major U.S. source," Hersh writes that the Obama administration cooperated with Pakistani intelligence officers to kill terrorist, which the chief of workers of the Pakistani army and director general of the Inter-Services Intelligence Agency knew concerning the mission, contrary to Obama's claim that Pakistani officers weren't tuned in to the raid beforehand.
A U.S. official with careful information of the reaching to the Pakistanis once the raid tells CNN that supported the reaction it absolutely was clear the Pakistanis failed to recognize beforehand
CNN National Security Analyst Peter city right away rebutted Hersh's allegations in a very post that contradicts most of the claims in his ten,000 word report."Hersh's account of the terrorist raid could be a miscellanea of nonsense that's contravened by a mess of spectator accounts, inconvenient facts and easy logic," city wrote Mon.Hersh's supply is known as a "retired senior intelligence official UN agency was {knowledgeable concerning|intimate|intimate with|knowledgeable|experienced} the initial intelligence about bin Laden's presence in Abbottabad."
And on CNN's "New Day" on Mon morning, Hersh defended that sourcing and questioned why the Obama administration hadn't nonetheless gone through the report.
"This isn't a wager — this is often a story that must be restricted by this government terribly seriously," he told CNN's Chris Cuomo.
Hersh stuck by his claims on CNN. In explaining why he relied mostly on the "major U.S. source," Hersh same that it's "very robust for guys still within to urge quoted extensively," and declared that he "vetted most and verified" his sourcing with more reportage in Asian country.
But Hersh, UN agency has drawn criticism for his serious use of anonymous sourcing before, admitted that he had gotten some things wrong in his reportage before.
"I would argue that plenty of the stories I wrote were just about on-mark," he said, however he acknowledged: "Nobody's good, after all -- everybody's done dangerous stories."
Indeed, he same he might have gotten the state wherever the military practiced the operation wrong within the piece as a result of "sometimes my geographics gets lousy."
Hersh additionally unconcealed that the piece hinged partly on associate degree on-the-record interview with former international intelligence agency head info. Assad Durrani UN agency told him, "look, you bought the story." That was "one of the items that created the story achievable currently wherever it would not have been" before, he said.
Bergen, in his report pushing back on Hersh's claims, says he reached resolute Durrani and received a way completely different response.
Durrani same he had "no proof of associate degreey kind" that the international intelligence agency knew that terrorist was activity in Abbottabad however he still might "make an assessment that this might be plausible."
Hersh additionally pushed back against skepticism over the claims in his article, line of work it a "Lewis author fairy tale" to believe terrorist would've been activity in such associate degree simply accessible region of Asian country.
The administration has same they received info on bin Laden's whereabouts by following his traveler, which the highest military target was killed {in a|during a|in associate degree exceedingly|in a very} firefight with an elite team of Navy SEALs.
But Hersh writes that the Obama administration had at first united to mention {bin laden|bin Laden|Osama terrorist|Usama bin Laden|terrorist} had been killed by a drone strike; that international intelligence agency was holding bin Laden a unfortunate person at the Abbottabad compound wherever he was killed, which a former senior Pakistani intelligence agent told the U.S. of his whereabouts for the $25 million award being offered at the time.
Hersh additionally reports on jactitation from some SEALs that terrorist wasn't given a burial bewildered that adhered to Islamic non secular traditions because the administration had claimed -- rather, his remains "were thrown into a personnel pouch and, throughout the eggbeater flight back to Jalalabad, some body elements were tossed out over the mountain range mountains."Hersh additionally alleges Obama's speech saying the productive mission was "put along in a very rush," not vetted or cleared by national security officers and created "chaos within the weeks following."
"This series of selfish and inaccurate statements would produce chaos within the weeks following," he said.
Hersh quotes his supply as saying: "This wasn't the fog of war.
"The proven fact that there was associate degree agreement with the Pakistanis and no contingency analysis of what was to be disclosed if one thing went wrong -- that wasn't even mentioned," the supply says. "And once it went wrong, that they had to form up a replacement cowl story on the fly."
Hersh won the newspaper publisher in 1970 for his surprising report on the My Lai massacre throughout the war that was wide attributable with contributory to the general public backlash against the war, and has since reported on conflicts in Republic of Iraq, Asian country and Syria.
But Hersh has come back beneath frequent criticism for his serious use of nameless sources. In 2004, for example, his report that Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld effectively approved abuses against terrorists control at Abu Ghraib jail was laid-off by a Pentagon advocator as "the most hysterical piece of journalist malpractice I actually have ever discovered."
Blogger Comment
Facebook Comment